Custom Search

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

CRIMINAL DEFENSE

Located in Columbia, South Carolina, the criminal defense attorneys at Strom Law Firm, L.L.C. defend individuals and corporations on criminal charges in all State and Federal Courts in South Carolina. Whether you have been accused of a misdemeanor, felony, or white-collar crime in State or Federal Court, or need a criminal appeal, we have a combination of awareness and experience to provide you with aggressive, effective criminal defense in any court. Our skilled criminal defense lawyers include a former United States Attorney, a former public defender, a former Assistant Attorney General and Richland County Assistant Solicitor, and a tax lawyer. Our familiarity with prosecutorial techniques and knowledge of criminal law ensures that you will receive a vigorous, well-planned criminal defense. Our firm also helps clients move beyond past mistakes with a criminal records expungement or a pardon.

If a loved one has been arrested or you are dealing with some legal problems, and need important contact information or directions to jails, courts, sheriff's offices, etc. please use our county directory.

We understand the criminal defense client

A pending criminal investigation or arrest on criminal charges represents a personal, family, social, business, and financial crisis the likes of which most individuals have never experienced in their lives. Our criminal defense lawyers understand this important fact of our client's circumstance is the starting point in undertaking representation of those accused of a crime. When personal freedom, personal and family stability, economic survival, and reputation is at stake, people need a criminal defense attorney who understands their needs and will fight to protect their rights.

The goal of the criminal defense lawyers at Strom Law Firm is to provide that kind of legal representation. The Strom Law Firm's goal is to provide aggressive and proactive defense to every accused person. The Strom Law Firm philosophy is that this can only be done by maintaining the highest standards of professional competence combined with an understanding and concern for the rights and liberty of all individuals facing criminal investigation and arrest.

Minor charges can lead to major consequences

Driving under the influence, commonly known as DUI, and other traffic offenses can lead to major life altering consequences beyond the mere fine imposed for such a violation including loss or impairment of one's driver's license and increased insurance rates.

A conviction or bond forfeiture for simple possession of marijuana creates a criminal record, which requires an automatic driver's license suspension and can lead to loss of job opportunities, educational opportunities, military opportunities, and beyond.

A simple criminal domestic violence conviction is a criminal offense in South Carolina and, under current federal law, would destroy the right of the accused person to own or possess a firearm.

A conviction for a minor's possession of alcohol or a false I.D. results in an automatic driver's license suspension.

The Strom Law Firm encourages all individuals who receive traffic citations or warrants for what seem to be minor traffic or criminal offenses to consider seeking a free consultation with an attorney before giving up the right to contest the charge by jury trial or otherwise. The Strom Law Firm provides free consultation for these fmatters. It is not difficult to look in the yellow pages or on the internet to find a criminal defense lawyer in Columbia, S.C. Depending on your criminal charges, one may want to hire an experienced criminal defense attorney over the cheapest lawyer.

Significance

The initial interview with a prospective criminal client is very important. It should establish the basis for ensuring the trust and cooperation of the client, obtain the necessary information regarding the facts of the case, and explain the fees and expenses involved in the criminal representation and the terms under which the attorney will work.

Early in the attorney-client relationship, an experienced attorney should stress the importance of the accused's honesty and cooperation with the attorney in preparing the criminal defense and that the accused must inform the lawyer of all the relevant facts involved. The attorney-client privilege should be discussed with the client in order to encourage honesty and openness in the relationship. Counsel should also admonish the defendant not to discuss the case with anyone other than counsel or one of his or her representatives. This is particularly important if the defendant is in the detention center. An incarcerated defendant should never discuss the case with other inmates or visitors. Similarly, the defendant should be advised that all personal mail will be censored, and the defendant should assume that anything contained in a personal letter is being read by the jail authorities. Theoretically, this procedure does not apply to attorney-client correspondence, but it is advisable to proceed on the assumption that this correspondence is also being censored. Similarly, those accused of a crime should assume that all phone conversations from the jail are being monitored. Finally, the defendant should be admonished never to agree to any conversation or activity with police authorities without requesting the presence of counsel. Everyone accused of a crime in South Carolina has a right to an attorney.

During the first interview with a defendant, the criminal attorney may wish to discuss the elements of the crime against the defendant and the criminal penalties that attach to the particular crime involved. It is also advisable to discuss the criminal procedures usually followed in handling the type of criminal case under consideration. However, the law firm must be careful not to make specific promises or guarantees as to the result of his or her representation.

Depending on the client and the criminal attorney's personal preference, the attorney may want to discuss and settle the fee agreement and terms of employment before spending any great length of time investigating the facts of the case. In any event, the attorney will find it helpful to get the facts from the client as soon as possible. It may be helpful if counsel obtains a written copy of the defendant's criminal discovery including the defendant's statement of the facts of the case and relevant background information or a recording of the necessary factual and background information.

Presence of Third Persons

As a general rule, third persons should not be present during the attorney's interview with the defendant, particularly if the defendant will be discussing the facts concerning his or her alleged involvement in the offense. The presence of others may cause the defendant to feel ill at ease and be reluctant to honestly and openly discuss the case. More importantly, the presence of persons other than counsel and those persons engaged by counsel to aid in the defense may prevent the substance of communications made during the interview from being protected by the attorney-client privilege.

When your freedom, personal and family stability, economic survival, and reputation are at stake — you need a lawyer who understands that and who will fight to protect your interests.

Strom Law Firm is a place you can find that kind of lawyer.

Toll Free 888.490.2847
Free Consultations • Flexible Appointments • Se Habla Español

Being arrested or investigated for a crime can mean many things. What it does not mean is that you are guilty or that you have no rights. For experienced criminal defense attorneys who will fight for you whether the case involves a drug possession misdemeanor or felony drug trafficking and murder charges — call or contact us in Columbia, South Carolina, today.


article source : http://www.stromlaw.com/CM/CriminalDefense/State-and-Federal-Criminal-Defense.asp

Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer Serving People Accused of a Crime in Massachusetts

The Law Office of John H. LaChance, in Framingham, is exclusively dedicated to defending people who are charged with state and federal crimes in the Worcester and Metro West area. If you or someone you love has been arrested or is under investigation for a serious crime, contact attorney John H. LaChance for skilled, experienced criminal defense.

Dedicated to Criminal Defense and the Defense of Clients' Rights

Attorney John H. LaChance has more than 35 years of trial experience with state and federal criminal defense in Massachusetts. His trial experience and experience as a former Assistant United States Attorney help his clients in the early stages of investigation, through litigation, and to appeals if necessary.

Mr. LaChance stands between his clients and the government's prosecutors. If you contact him when you are being investigated for a crime such as fraud or murder, he can help protect your rights during questioning and shield you from the emotional and psychological pressure that comes from being accused of a serious crime.

Vast Experience with All Aspects of a Criminal Trial

Over the past three decades, Mr. LaChance has had significant experience with forensic evidence, expert witnesses, and with cases involving proof of competency. These skills are especially helpful when called upon during the investigation and trial of murder, sexual assault, and drug crimes, as well as when pursuing criminal appeals after a conviction.

Mr. LaChance offers personal attention and aggressive representation for clients who are charged with serious crimes in Massachusetts, from federal drug crimes to child sexual assault. Attorney LaChance is compassionate with clients but an aggressive advocate for your rights when facing the prosecution.

Contact Criminal Defense Attorney John H. LaChance

The firm offers free initial consultations. If you have been arrested for a DUI, drug crime, sex crime, or any other crime or if you wish to meet with a federal criminal defense lawyer, contact The Law Office of John H. LaChance in Framingham. Mr. LaChance can be reached by calling (508) 879-5730 or by filling out the intake form on the Contact Page.


article source : http://www.lachancelaw.net/

Criminal Defense

Tilem & Campbell, PC is a White Plains, New York law firm providing exceptional state and federal criminal defense representation. Our firm combines the skills of a former Senior Prosecutor in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, a former Westchester and Suffolk Assistant District Attorney and an experienced practitioner and appellate advocate. We represent clients in all state and federal courts in New York and Connecticut.

Our lawyers have handled thousands of cases, from homicides, serious felonies and complex conspiracies to misdemeanors and traffic offenses. As former prosecutors, we understand how prosecuting attorneys prepare cases and we prepare our clients for any contingency. Some of the federal and state crimes we are prepared to handle include:

Homicide, murder, manslaughter

Weapons crimes

Gun crimes

Assault and battery

DWI/DUI

Traffic violations

Traffic misdemeanors

Driving with a suspended license

Reckless driving

Speeding

Leaving the Scene of an Incident

Computer Crimes


Appeals

Drug possession

Narcotics and drug crimes

Larceny and grand larceny

Conspiracy

Internet offenses

White collar crimes

Embezzlement

Mortgage fraud

Tax fraud

Identity Theft

Escort Service and Prostitution Related Offenses

Other state and federal criminal defense matters


The potential loss of freedom, civil rights, and personal assets is a grave situation. It is important to hire an attorney as soon as you have been arrested or know you are under investigation.

But hiring the right New York criminal defense attorney can be a difficult decision. We have helped many people facing difficult and daunting criminal charges. Our lawyers have worked on many high-profile criminal defense cases and understand how to manage the circumstances that surround our client’s cases.

We understand the importance of hiring skilled professionals. We regularly work with investigators, forensic psychiatrists, and other experts that can assist in preparing our client's defense. In every case, our lawyers work one-on-one with clients from beginning to end to work out the best possible solution.

Contact Us

Please contact Tilem and Campbell, PC regarding your legal matter. We can be reached by phone at (914) 833-9785, or by E-Mail.

New York Criminal Attorney Blog - Criminal Procedure

Criminal Defense

In an age of aggressive prosecutors and the criminalization of what was formerly civil offenses, professionals, business executives and public servants often find themselves accused of criminal acts. For those people, the firm offers the services and expertise of its white-collar criminal defense practice group.

The firm’s attorneys specialize in the area of criminal defense. Miami criminal defense requires a certain toughness along with knowledge of the system that only can be truly realized by former prosecutors. A person charged with a crime either in state or federal court deserves and requires a criminal defense attorney that will fight for and protect the rights of the client. The lawyers at Donet, McMillan and Trontz are the Miami criminal defense lawyers you need to protect your rights and provide you with a favorable resolution to your case.

Why DMT?

The law firm of Donet, McMillan & Trontz has been given the highest possible rating (AV) by Martindale Hubbell. Its partners have been named as the Florida Trend’s Legal Elite, as well as to Florida’s Super Lawyers. These awards ensure our clients that they will be represented by top criminal defense attorneys who are recognized as such in the courtrooms of Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, Broward, and Monroe counties.

The formation of the firm by three star Miami criminal lawyers originated from the founding attorneys’ desire and commitment to providing their clients with aggressive legal representation balanced with personal service, efficiency, skill, professionalism, and results.

DMT handles all kinds of criminal matters in both state and federal courts. Our criminal defense attorneys are among the most experienced criminal lawyers in South Florida. The firm has extensive experience in every aspect of criminal defense in both state and federal courts through out the State of Florida.

What Criminal Defense Cases Does DMT Take?

Our criminal defense attorneys have vast experience in all criminal matters including drug possession, drug possession, drug trafficking and drug cultivation, conspiracy, driving or boating under the influence of alcohol or drugs, grand jury proceedings, racketeering (RICO cases), white collar crime, money laundering, SEC violations, tax crimes, asset forfeiture, fraud, theft, murder, sexual assault, sexual battery and public corruption:

White Collar Crimes

Accounting Fraud
Bank Fraud
Bankruptcy Fraud
Bribery
Computer Hacking
Counterfeiting
Credit Card Fraud
Currency Violations
Embezzlement
Environmental Crimes
Extortion
Forgery
Fraud
Government Fraud
Health Care Fraud
Identity Theft
Import/Export Crimes
Insider Trading
Internet Fraud
Internet Theft
Investment Fraud
Laboratory Fraud
Mail Fraud
Medicaid Fraud
Medicare Fraud
MLM Crimes
Money Laundering
Mortgage Fraud
Official Misconduct
Organized Fraud
Perjury
Prescription Fraud
Procurement Fraud
Public Corruption
RICO Charges
Securities Fraud
Tax Fraud
Telecom Fraud
Telemarketing Fraud
Petit Theft
Theft
Grand Theft
Wire Fraud
Witness Tampering / Threats

Appeals/Post-conviction

Appeals (Federal and State)
Changes of Plea
Motions for a New Trial
Plea Withdrawals
Post-Conviction Motions
Sentence Appeals
Sentence Modifications
Sentence Reversals

Sex Crimes

Child Abuse
Child Enticement
Child Molestation
Child Neglect
Child Pornography
Child Procurement
Date Rape
Child Abuse
Exploitation
Depraved Indifference
Failure to Register
Indecent Exposure
Internet Pornography
Lewd Conduct Lewd & Lascivious
Pandering
Prostitution
Sexual Assault
Sexual Battery
Sexual Imposition
Sodomy
Solicitation

Other Crimes

Aiding/Abetting
Arms Trafficking
Conspiracy
Munchausen by Proxy
Obstruction of Justice
Perjury
Resisting Arrest
Stalking
Aggravated Stalking
Violation of Injunction
Alien Smuggling
Possession of Firearm
CCF
Carrying a Concealed Weapon
Carrying a Concealed Firearm
Possession of a firearm by a felon

Drug Crimes

Cultivation Marijuana
Distribution Cocaine
Distribution Heroine
Distribution Marijuana
Distribution Ecstasy
Importation Cocaine
Importation Ecstasy
Importation Heroine
Manufacturing Marijuana
Possession for Sale
Trafficking
Armed Trafficking
Drug Trafficking
Transportation

Violent Crimes

Armed Criminal Action
Armed Robbery
Arson
Assault
Aggravated Assault
Aggravated Battery
Battery on Elderly
Battery on Law Enforcement Officer
Battery on Pregnant
Battery
Armed Burglary
Burglary Dwelling
Burglary Structure
Burglary Conveyance
Armed Carjacking
Car Burglary
Car Theft
Carjacking
Child Abuse
Criminal Mischief
Depraved Indifference
Domestic Violence
Habitual Offenders
Habitual Traffic Offender
Hate Crimes
House Burglary
Kidnapping
Armed Kidnapping
Manslaughter
Mayhem
Murder
Attempted Murder
Robbery
Armed Robbery
Terrorism Charges
Terrorist Threats

Forfeiture Cases

Federal
State
Seizures of Bank Accounts
Seizures of Cars, Boats, Houses
Seizures of Cash
Seizures of Property

Traffic Crimes

DWLS
Driving with License Suspended
Habitual Traffic Offender
Hit and Run
LSA
Leaving the Scene of Accident
Reckless Driving
DUI
Driving Under the Influence
Driving While Intoxicated
Drunk Driving
DUI Homicide
DUI Manslaughter
Vehicular Homicide
Vehicular Manslaughter





article source :http://www.dmt-law.com/miami-lawyer-attorney/criminal-defense.php

HOW TO CHOOSE A GOOD CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER

When you are facing serious consequences, such as jail, fines, or probation, you can't afford not to have a lawyer with experience, knowledge, and a stellar reputation with the courts, judges, and prosecutors sitting next to you in court.

The first priority for anyone recently released from jail on a cash or signature bond is to prepare for the next court date. Some event occurred that resulted in an arrest. An arrest occurred because evidence existed to substantiate a crime was committed by the person arrested. That evidence will be sitting on the other side of the courtroom in the very near future.

The best way to prepare for your next court date is to immediately contact a very experienced criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible; the sooner you involve your attorney in your case, the better your chances for a successful defense. If you are under investigation, or if you have been arrested but have not been charged yet, you should consult with an attorney right away and ask if it is possible to have the charges dismissed.

With so many lawyers out there, you may be wondering how to choose a criminal defense lawyer for your immediate needs. Perhaps the single most important criteria in choosing the right criminal defense lawyer for you and your situation is “trust.” Considering that this may be your very first contact with or need for a criminal defense lawyer, how can you possibly know which one to trust?

The following suggestions may be of assistance to you.

Suggested Method For Finding A Good Criminal Defense Lawyer

  1. Conduct an online search for an attorney in the location where you were charged by narrowing the search to the precise criminal charge. Example: sexual assault defense attorney madison wi, drug possession columbus WI
  2. Select the top three or four firms, and review the attorneys' credentials while asking yourself the hard questions: What is his/her background? If you charged with a drug crime, has this attorney practiced in Federal court, or were they a Federal prosecutor? If you are charged with drunk driving, what is his or her background in defending DUI cases? Is DUI a main focus or a gap filler for this firm, or worse yet, are they a drunk driving milling house with a desire to draw in hundreds upon hundreds of OWI cases and plea bargain through the lists? If you are charged with a property crime, how much of this attorney's website is devoted to property crimes such as theft, embezzlement, fraud, or burglary?
  3. Conduct a search on the attorney's name. Does this attorney appear our there on the net with cases that prove his or her claims? You might also try the Wisconsin State Journal website (www.madison.com) and the local TV stations.
  4. Go to the websites of the major and most reputable criminal defense associations and search for the attorney's name. The legal field is a very "telling industry" and those who are regarded very highly are often also members or leaders of the highly regarded associations. For drunk driving, the National College for DUI Defense is certainly the American Bar Association's most regarded association, their website is at www.ncdd.org. For criminal defense in Wisconsin, visit the Wisconsin Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, www.wacdl.com. Those types of websites do not portray lawyers according to their advertised documentation, rather they provide the facts.
  5. Lastly, call the firm and ask if they provide a free consultation so that you actually speak with the attorney that will represent you.

Important Considerations When Choosing Your Defense Attorney

  1. Publications - If attorneys publish articles, books, or treatises (legal reference guides), they are already subjected to the toughest critics of all (other attorneys) and they are often regarded as experts in that subject matter.
  2. Acquittals - If attorneys win outright acquittals on very serious criminal charges, they prepare well, fight hard, play fair in the court's eyes and win juries over with their arguments. An outright acquittal is a not guilty verdict (the closest response from a court to a statement of innocence).
  3. Leadership - Legal organizations are rather particular about the attorneys they choose to be their leaders. In legal organizations where the leader is voted into office, the members are acknowledging that the officer is highly regarded by the legal community.
  4. Bar referrals - Often times, state bars provide an excellent reference source when a person is looking for an attorney. If the attorney has been disciplined, records of the past action are often available on the bar's website. However, as a referral source, they are limited to providing the name of the next-in-line firm or attorney and usually prohibited from making any recommendation beyond that information.
  5. Criminal Law Commentators & Legal Analysts - Major television networks and local TV and radio stations often invite subject matter experts to comment on various public questions about the law. Attorneys commenting to the nation or state on behalf of a network TV station are regarded as experts in their industry.
article source : http://www.vanwagnerwood.com/CM/Custom/HOW_TO_CHOOSE_A_GOOD_CRIMINAL_DEFENSE_LAWYER.asp

Federal Criminal Procedure Guide

In General. These rules govern the procedure in all criminal proceedings in the district courts, the courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court of the United States. This guide is fairly lengthy and very detailed in its description of the rules governing federal criminal law particularly as applied to the courts in New York. As such, it is written for those who wish to take a good deal of time to review the federal criminal system in addition to those looking for a qualified federal criminal defense attorney. The other articles on our site are perhaps more user friendly for those who want a quick overview of what to expect when facing a federal government investigation or arrest and federal prosecuton by the FBI, CIA, ICE, U.S. Marshalls, DEA, ATF, DOJ or S.S.
(4) Removed Proceedings. Although these rules govern all proceedings after removal from a state court, state law governs a dismissal by the prosecution.
(5) Excluded Proceedings. Proceedings not governed by these rules include:
(A) the extradition and rendition of a fugitive:
(B) a civil property forfeiture for violating a federal statute;
(C) the collection of a fine or penalty;
(D) a proceeding under a statute governing juvenile delinquency to the extent the procedure is inconsistent with the statute, unless Rule 20 (D) provides otherwise;
(E) a dispute between seamen under 22 U.S.C. sec. 256-258; and
(F) a proceeding against a witness in a foreign country under 28 U.S.C. sec 1784
PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS
Rule 3. The Complaint
The complaint is a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. It must be made under oath before a magistrate judge or, if none is reasonably available, before a state or local judicial officer.
· If the complaint sets forth probable cause or one or more affidavits set forth probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed by the defendant, the judge will issue a warrant to an officer authorized to execute it.
· A judge can issue a warrant if a defendant fails to appear for a summons on the complaint.
(1) Warrants
A warrant must:
(A) contain the defendant's name or, if it is unknown, a name or description by which the defendant can be identified with reasonable certainty;
(B) describe the offense charged in the complaint;
(C) command that the defendant be arrested and brought without unnecessary delay before a magistrate judge or, if none is reasonably available, before a state or local judicial officer; and
(D) be signed by a judge.
(2) Summons
A summons must be in the same form as a warrant except that it must require the defendant to appear before a magistrate judge at a stated time and place.
(1) By Whom. Only a marshal or other authorized officer may execute a warrant. Any person authorized to serve a summons in a federal civil action may serve a summons.
(2) Location. A warrant may be executed, or a summons served, within the jurisdiction of the or anywhere else a federal statute authorizes an arrest.
(3) Manner
(A) A warrant is executed by arresting the defendant. Upon arrest, an officer possessing the warrant must show it to the defendant. If the officer does not possess the warrant, the officer must inform the defendant of the warrant's existence and of the offense charged and, at the defendant's request, must show the warrant to the defendant as soon as possible.
(B) A summons is served on an individual defendant:
(i) by delivering a copy to the defendant personally; or
(ii) by leaving a copy at the defendant's residence or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and discretion residing at that location and by mailing a copy to the defendant's last known address.
(C) A summons is served on an organization by delivering a copy to an officer, to a managing or general agent or to another agent appointed or legally authorized to receive service of process. A copy must also be mailed to the organization's last known address within the district or to its principal place of business elsewhere in the .
(4) Return.
(A) After executing a warrant, the officer must return it to the judge before whom the defendant is brought. At the request of an attorney for the government, an unexecuted warrant must be brought back to and canceled by a magistrate judge or, if none is reasonably available, by a state or local judicial officer.
(B) The person to whom a summons was delivered for service must return it on or before the return day.
(C) At the request of an attorney for the government, a judge may deliver an unexecuted warrant, an unserved summons, or a copy of the warrant or summons to the marshal or other authorized person for execution or service.
Rule 5. Initial Appearance
Appearance Upon an Arrest.
(A) A person making an arrest within the must take the defendant without unnecessary delay before a magistrate judge, or before a state or local judicial officer as Rule 5(c) provides, unless a statute provides otherwise.
(B) A person making an arrest outside the must take the defendant without unnecessary delay before a magistrate judge, unless a statute provides otherwise.
(3) Appearance Upon a Summons. When a defendant appears in response to a summons under Rule 4, a magistrate judge must proceed under Rule 5(d) or (e), as applicable.
(b) Arrest Without a Warrant. If a defendant is arrested without a warrant, a complaint meeting Rule 4(a)'s requirement of probable cause must be promptly filed in the district where the offense was allegedly committed.
(c) Place of Initial Appearance; Transfer to Another District
(1) Arrest in the District Where the Offense Was Allegedly Committed. If the defendant is arrested in the district where the offense was allegedly committed:
(A) the initial appearance must be in that district; and
(B) if a magistrate judge is not reasonably available, the initial appearance may be before a state or local judicial officer.
(2) Arrest in a District Other Than Where the Offense Was Allegedly Committed. If the defendant was arrested in a district other than where the offense was allegedly committed, the initial appearance must be:
(A) in the district of arrest; or
(B) in an adjacent district if: (i) the appearance can occur more promptly there; or
(ii) the offense was allegedly committed there and the initial appearance will occur on the day of arrest.
(3) Procedures in a District Other Than Where the Offense Was Allegedly Committed. If the initial appearance occurs in a district other than where the offense was allegedly committed, the following procedures apply:
(A) the magistrate judge must inform the defendant about the provisions of Rule 20;
(B) if the defendant was arrested without a warrant, the district court where the offense was allegedly committed must first issue a warrant before the magistrate judge transfers the defendant to that district.
(C) the magistrate judge must conduct a preliminary hearing if required by Rule 5.1;
(D) the magistrate judge must transfer the defendant to the district where the offense was allegedly committed if;
(i) the government produces the warrant, a certified copy of the warrant, or a reliable electronic form of either; and
(ii) the judge finds that the defendant is the same person named in the indictment, information, or warrant; and
(E) when a defendant is transferred and discharged, the clerk must promptly transmit the papers and any bail to the clerk in the district where the offense was allegedly committed.
(d) Procedure in a Felony Case.
(1) Advice. If the defendant is charged with a felony, the judge must inform the defendant of the following:
(A) the complaint against the defendant, and any affidavit filed with it;
(B) the defendant's right to retain counsel or to request that counsel be appointed if the defendant cannot obtain counsel;
(C) the circumstances, if any, under which the defendant may secure pretrial release;
(D) any right to a preliminary hearing; and
(E) the defendant's right not to make a statement, and that any statement made may be used against the defendant.
(2) Consulting with Counsel. The judge must allow the defendant reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel.
(3) Detention or Release. The judge must detain or release the defendant as provided by statute or these rules.
(4) Plea. A defendant may be asked to plead only under Rule 10.
(e) Procedure in a Misdemeanor Case. If the defendant is charged with a misdemeanor only, the judge must inform the defendant in accordance with Rule 58(b)(2).
(f) Video Teleconferencing. Video teleconferencing may be used to conduct an appearance under this rule if the defendant consents.
Rule 5.1. Preliminary Hearing
(a) In general. If a defendant is charged with an offense other than a petty offense, a magistrate judge must conduct a preliminary hearing unless:
(1) the defendant waives the hearing;
(2) the defendant is indicted;
(3) the government files an information under Rule 7(b) charging the defendant with a felony;
(4) the government files an information charging the defendant with a misdemeanor; or
(5) the defendant is charged with a misdemeanor and consents to trial before a magistrate judge.
(b) Selecting a District. A defendant arrested in a district other than where the offense was allegedly committed may elect to have the preliminary hearing conducted in the district where the prosecution is pending.

(c) Scheduling. The magistrate judge must hold the preliminary hearing within a reasonable time, but no later than 10 days after the initial appearance if the defendant is in custody and no later than 20 days if not in custody.

(d) Extending the Time. With the defendant's consent and upon a showing of good cause--taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases--a magistrate judge may extend the time limits in Rule 5.1(c) one or more times. If the defendant does not consent, the magistrate judge may extend the time limits only on a showing that extraordinary circumstances exist and justice requires the delay.
(e) Hearing and Finding. At the preliminary hearing, the defendant may cross-examine adverse witnesses and may introduce evidence but may not object to evidence on the ground that it was unlawfully acquired. If the magistrate judge finds probable cause to believe an offense has been committed and the defendant committed it, the magistrate judge must promptly require the defendant to appear for further proceedings.
(f) Discharging the Defendant. If the magistrate judge finds no probable cause to believe an offense has been committed or the defendant committed it, the magistrate judge must dismiss the complaint and discharge the defendant. A discharge does not preclude the government from later prosecuting the defendant for the same offense.
(g) Recording the Proceedings. The preliminary hearing must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device. A recording of the proceeding may be made available to any party upon request. A copy of the recording and a transcript may be provided to any party upon request and upon any payment required by applicable Judicial Conference regulations.
(h) Producing a Statement.
(1) In General. Rule 26.2(a)-(d) and (f) applies at any hearing under this rule, unless the magistrate judge for good cause rules otherwise in a particular case.
(2) Sanctions for Not Producing a Statement. If a party disobeys a Rule 26.2 order to deliver a statement to the moving party, the magistrate judge must not consider the testimony of a witness whose statement is withheld.
III. THE GRAND JURY, THE INDICTMENT, AND THE INFORMATION
Rule 6. The Grand Jury
(a) Summoning a Grand Jury.
(1) In General. When the public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be summoned. A grand jury must have 16 to 23 members, and the court must order that enough legally qualified persons be summoned to meet this requirement.
(2) Alternate Jurors. When a grand jury is selected, the court may also select alternate jurors. Alternate jurors must have the same qualifications and be selected in the same manner as any other juror. Alternate jurors replace jurors in the same sequence in which the alternates were selected. An alternate juror who replaces a juror is subject to the same challenges, takes the same oath, and has the same authority as the other jurors.
(b) Objection to the Grand Jury or to a Grand Juror.
(1) Challenges. Either the government or a defendant may challenge the grand jury on the ground that it was not lawfully drawn, summoned, or selected, and may challenge an individual juror on the ground that the juror is not legally qualified.
(2) Motion to Dismiss an Indictment. A party may move to dismiss the indictment based on an objection to the grand jury or on an individual juror's lack of legal qualification, unless the court has previously ruled on the same objection under Rule 6(b)(1). The motion to dismiss is governed by 28 U.S.C. sec. 1867(e). The court must not dismiss the indictment on the ground that a grand juror was not legally qualified if the record shows that at least 12 qualified jurors concurred in the indictment.
(c) Foreperson and Deputy Foreperson. The court will appoint one juror as the foreperson and another as the deputy foreperson. In the foreperson's absence, the deputy foreperson will act as the foreperson. The foreperson may administer oaths and affirmations and will sign all indictments. The foreperson--or another juror designated by the foreperson--will record the number of jurors concurring in every indictment and will file the record with the clerk, but the record may not be made public unless the court so orders.
(d) Who May Be Present.
(1) While Grand Jury is in Session. The following persons may be present while the grand jury is in session: attorneys for the government, the witness being questioned, interpreters when needed, and a court reporter or an operator of a recording device.
(2) During Deliberations and Voting. No person other than the jurors, and any interpreter needed to assist a hearing-impaired or speech-impaired juror, may be present while the grand jury is deliberating or voting.
(e) Recording and Disclosing the Proceedings.
(1) Recording the Proceedings. Except while the grand jury is deliberating or voting, all proceedings must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device. But the validity of a prosecution is not affected by the unintentional failure to make a recording. Unless the court orders otherwise, an attorney for the government will retain control of the recording, the reporter's notes, and any transcript prepared from those notes.
(2) Secrecy.
(A) No obligation of secrecy may be imposed on any person except in accordance with Rule 6(e)(2)(B).
(B) Unless these rules provide otherwise, the following persons must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury;
(i) a grand juror;
(ii) an interpreter;
(iii) a court reporter;
(Iv) an operator of a recording device;
(v) a person who transcribes recorded testimony;
(vi) an attorney for the government; or
(vii) a person to whom disclosure is made under Rule 6(e)(3)(A)(ii) or (iii).
(f) Inadmissibility of Withdrawn Intention. Evidence of an intention to rely on an alibi defense, later withdrawn, or of a statement made in connection with that intention, is not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the person who gave notice of the intention.
Rule 12.2. Notice of an Insanity Defense; Mental Examination
(a) Notice of an Insanity Defense. A defendant who intends to assert a defense of insanity at the time of the alleged offense must so notify an attorney for the government in writing within the time provided for filing a pretrial motion, or at any later time the court sets, and file a copy of the notice with the clerk. A defendant who fails to do so cannot rely on an insanity defense. The court may, for good cause, allow the defendant to file the notice late, grant additional trial-preparation time, or make other appropriate orders.
(b) Notice of Expert Evidence of a Mental Condition. If a defendant intends to introduce expert evidence relating to a mental disease or defect or any other mental condition of the defendant bearing on either (1) the issue of guilt or (2) the issue of punishment in a capital case, the defendant must--within the time provided for filing a pretrial motion or at any later time the court sets--notify an attorney for the government in writing of this intention and file a copy of the notice with the clerk. The court may, for good cause, allow the defendant to file the notice late, grant the parties additional trial-preparation time, or make other appropriate orders.
(c) Mental Examination.
(1) Authority to Order an Examination; Procedures.
(A) The court may order the defendant to submit to a competency examination under 18 U.S.C. sec. 4241.
(B) If the defendant provides notice under Rule 12.2(a), the court must, upon the government's motion, order the defendant to be examined under 18 U.S.C. sec. 4242. If the defendant provides notice under Rule 12.2(b) the court may, upon the government's motion, order the defendant to be examined under procedures ordered by the court.
(2) Disclosing Results and Reports of Capital Sentencing Examination. The results and reports of any examination conducted solely under Rule 12.2(c)(1) after notice under Rule 12.2(b)(2) must be sealed and must not be disclosed to any attorney for the government or the defendant unless the defendant is found guilty of one or more capital crimes and the defendant confirms an intent to offer during sentencing proceedings expert evidence on mental condition.
(3) Disclosing Results and Reports of the Defendant's Expert Examination. After disclosure under Rule 12.2(c)(2) of the results and reports of the government's examination, the defendant must disclose to the government the results and reports of any examination on mental condition conducted by the defendant's expert about which the defendant intends to introduce expert evidence.
(4) Inadmissibility of a Defendant's Statements. No statement made by a defendant in the course of any examination conducted under this rule (whether conducted with or without the defendant's consent), no testimony by the expert based on the statement, and no other fruits of the statement may be admitted into evidence against the defendant in any criminal proceeding except on an issue regarding mental condition on which the defendant:
(A) has introduced evidence of incompetency or evidence requiring notice under Rule 12.2(a) or (b)(1), or
(B) has introduced expert evidence in a capital sentencing proceeding requiring notice under Rule 12.2(b)(2).

article source : http://www.theblanchlawfirm.com/

New York City Criminal Defense Attorney

A Message to our Clients from Ryan Blanch
"When I founded The Blanch Law Firm, even before its inception, I had envisioned a high-powered criminal litigation law firm such that would stand apart from the myriad of talented, if overwhelmed, one and two-lawyer practices. One that would handle cases the way big litigation firms do, with plenty of resources and a team of intelligent criminal attorneys working together. I had seen too many examples of the lone, brilliant attorney becoming ineffective once his time was spread over 100 cases.

I began my legal career in New York's powerhouse firms with 400 - 700+ lawyers and knew that I wanted our practice to run like a big firm but maintain the personal caring and client attention of a small law practice. The result today is our 7 lawyer criminal defense boutique where talented criminal trial attorneys have the time and resources to truly lawyer their cases and strategize plans of attack on each case. Every client has our cell phone numbers. I believe our case results speak for themselves."

Have you been accused
of a felony or other
serious crime?

You need a dedicated and knowledgeable attorney!

When someone is suspected of a crime, he or she always faces a difficult emotional challenge. Fear is something that comes to us all in certain situations, but when it's associated with a potential criminal prosecution, this fear can be paralyzing. The criminal defense attorneys at the Blanch Law Firm in New York City understand this reality, as the team of attorneys at the firm has been fighting for the rights of the accused for many years.

Basically, if you are looking at the possibility of being prosecuted, you need to work past that fear and take immediate steps to get the process of building your defense started. You are guaranteed certain rights under the Constitution, but neither the state nor the federal government are going to wait for you to assert them. You need an experienced criminal defense attorney to guide you through this process.

We have this experience, and the criminal defense attorneys at the firm handle a variety of high-profile criminal defense cases. A brief overview of a few examples is listed below:

Computer Crimes
Computer-related crimes are becoming more and more prevalent as the influence and saturation of the Internet continues to expand. Such crimes as fraud, identity theft, Internet sex crimes and hacking and virus dissemination are also prosecuted with increasing frequency by state and federal governments.

White Collar Crimes
White collar crimes include such charges as tax evasion, several forms of fraud, money laundering, enterprise corruption, RICO violations and bribery, among others, and many of these crimes fall under the jurisdiction of the federal government.

High-Profile Crimes
Certain crimes tend to draw a high degree of attention from the media, and these include murder, kidnapping, assault, federal crimes and vehicular manslaughter, among others.

Drug Crimes
Drug crimes are also generally heavily-covered by the media, depending on the nature of the charges, but the Blanch Law Firm handles such matters as trafficking, possession and international charges.

Juvenile Crimes
Juvenile crimes remain a bit of a mystery to the general public, but any juvenile case requires the same sort of diligent defense as any other criminal case, and the accused defendant could face serious penalties if convicted.

Drunk Driving
The penalties for drunk driving are becoming progressively more severe because of the public's demand for stricter enforcement and penalties, and the Blanch Law Firm handles such matters as sobriety testing, evidentiary matters and other related issues to DUI in New York.

Weapons Charges
A defendant could face weapons charges at either the state or federal level, and the Blanch Law Firm handles such matters as weapons trafficking and distribution, unlawful use, unlawful possession and aggravated or reckless discharge, among others.

Take Action
Of course, if you face a serious criminal matter that's not listed above, you still need legal help in building your defense. The Blanch Law Firm handles all types of high-end criminal cases, so contact the firm today to get the process of building your defense started.

article source : http://www.criminaldefensefirm.com/

Atlanta Criminal Lawyer Criminal Attorney Howard Weintraub

Georgia Criminal Attorney, Howard J. Weintraub, is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and Georgia criminal lawyer and Federal criminal lawyer with over 27 years of experience.

Free Consultation:
To discuss your case privately with an experienced Georgia criminal attorney, call Howard Weintraub now at (404) 892-2000.

Have you been in arrested or charged with a
state or federal crime in Georgia?

My firm concentrates in the practice of criminal law in Atlanta, Georgia. I have served the greater Atlanta community since 1985, as a Federal and Georgia criminal lawyer in areas of criminal defense, drug prosecutions, white collar crimes, criminal tax matters, and criminal/civil forfeitures of United States currency and other property because of allegations of illegal criminal activities associated with the currency and/or property.


I represent clients who need a Georgia state or federal criminal lawyer in every level of the Georgia state and federal court systems, and in the federal courts throughout the United States, including the United States Supreme Court.

The cornerstone of my success is the quality relationship that I maintain with clients. Clients are treated with integrity and respect for their needs, goals and objectives. I focus on intelligent, aggressive and ethical legal representation and I pledge to listen to and continuously communicate with all of my clients.

I use the latest technology and cost-effective methods to provide services in a professional and courteous atmosphere.

I am a former federal prosecutor turned defense attorney, and have helped many people get their lives back together after suffering the potentially devastating consequences of an arrest or conviction.

Don't wait. Call me now at (404) 892-2000 for a free consultation and to learn more about your case.

I have over 27 years experience as a criminal trial lawyer. Let me put my experience to work for you. Call me now to discuss your case.

article source : http://www.atlanta-criminal-lawyer.com/